Month / July 2023

by lawrenceofcanadia

PGA Tour Golf III – Review

By the mid-90s, Electronic Arts, under EA Sports, seemed to have established themselves as the number one developers of sports simulations. American football, football, rugby, ice hockey, golf, cricket and basketball, their games were lauded for their realism, gameplay, graphics, and ability to get licenses of sports personalities and teams to incorporate into their games. With the critical and commercial success of PGA Tour Golf II (1992), it made sense for EA to continue the franchise. Would PGA Tour Golf III garner the same praise from critics and achieve commercial success as well?

Title screen (screenshot taken by the author)

PGA Tour Golf III is a sports simulation video game. It was developed by Hitmen Productions and published by EA Sports for the Sega Mega Drive in 1994.

Gameplay

There are three modes to choose from:

Practice Round – Play 18 holes on any course just for fun. You can also just practice your long game on the driving range and/or short game on the putting green.

Tournament – Compete in any tournament which consists of 4 rounds of 18-hole rounds. However, to qualify for the next round, you must make the cut by ensuring you score low enough on your round. If you successfully compete the final round, you earn money and may even win the tournament if you consistently score the lowest numbers of strokes per round.

Skins Challenge – Two to four players can compete in an 18-hole match where each hole is assigned a monetary value. To win the hole, simply complete the hole in the least strokes. The winner takes the pot for that hole. The value of the holes increase as the match progresses. If a hole is tied, the money rolls over to the next hole. To make it more interesting, you can also opt to have pros join the game controlled by the computer.

The portraits of the players and commentator as well as the background images have now been digitized. (screenshot taken by the author)

You can play eight courses including:

TPC at Avenel

TPC at Las Colinas (New)

TPC at River Highlands (New)

TPC at Scottsdale

TPC at Southwind

TPC at Summerlin (New)

TPC at The Woodlands (New)

Advice from the professionals before every hole (screenshot taken by the author)

Unlike previous PGA Tour Golf games, you can play as one of eleven professional golfers who had won the following accolades at the time of the game’s release:

Brad Faxon – Three professional tournament wins

Jim Gallagher Jr. – Three professional tournament wins including The Tour Championship (1993)

Lee Janzen – Three professional tournament wins including the US Open (1993)

Tom Kite – Nineteen professional tournament wins including The Players Championship (1989), Nabisco Championship (1989), and the US Open (1992)

Bruce Lietzke – Twelve professional tournament wins including the Canadian Open (1978 & 1982)

Davis Love III – Eight professional tournament wins including The Players Championship (1992)

Mark O’Meara – Eight professional tournament wins

Jeff Sluman – One professional tournament win which was the PGA Championship (1988)

Craig Stadler – Ten professional tournament wins including the Masters Tournament (1982) and The Tour Championship (1991)

Fuzzy Zoeller – Ten professional tournament wins including the Masters Tournament (1979) and the US Open (1984)

Other than that, the gameplay hasn’t changed much. At the beginning of each hole, there is a slow flyover approach to the green with advice from one of the professional golfers on how to approach the hole.  Before each stroke, a bird’s eye view of the hole with a cross hair over the pin will appear. You can move the cursor and it tells you the distance from your golfer to the cursor. You can go back to the overview at any time by pressing ‘A’ button.

There has been a slight change to the gameplay. For example, when addressing the ball, a box with the lie of the ball appears where you can move a cursor allowing you effect the flight of the ball by adding a draw or fade to the flight or affect the arc of the ball. You can also change your type of shot from Normal, to Chip to Punch shot.

The information shown on the HUD has not changed. The wind speed and direction box is still on the bottom left, the power gauge remains in the middle, and the hole number, hole par, stroke number, current score, distance to pin and club are still bottom right. On the horizon is the cross hair which shows you were you are aiming your shot. You can move this cursor left or right. Your caddy will automatically select the club they think you should use but you can change clubs yourself by pushing up or down on the D-pad. As you do this, you will notice the number to the left of the power gauge will increase or decrease. This is the maximum number of yards the club will hit the ball if the ball was unaffected by wind or how the ball lies.

When you are ready to hit the ball, press ‘B’ and the power gauge begins to fill from right to left. When you have reached your desired power, press ‘B’ again and the power bar begins to descend having left a mark when you stopped the power gauge rising. You then need to press ‘B’ a third time as the power bar reaches the Stroke Bar. If you are accurate, you will hit the ball without a slice or draw. The earlier or later your stop the power gauge either side of the stroke bar will determine the degree of which you slice or draw the ball. After striking the ball, and when the ball begins to descend, the camera angle changes, and you will see where the ball lands.

When you reach the green, a 3D square grid will appear showing you the lie of the green. This allows you to judge the slopes of the green when attempting to putt. Again, by pressing up and down on the D-pad when you are on the green increases and decreases the maximum power of the putt. The 3D view when observing the putting green is unaltered from PGA Tour II (1992). I guess if it ain’t broke, why fix it?

PGA Tour Golf II (1992) (screenshot taken by the author)
PGA Tour Golf III (screenshot taken by the author)

How Does It Handle?

Again, little has changed from the first two PGA Tour instalments. The game is easy to pick up and play but mastering it will take patience and practice. It might just be me, but I found this game harder than its predecessors. I can’t seem to place very high in any of tournaments. Clearly, I need more practice.

You have to be incredibly precise (maybe too precise) when you try to stop the descending gauge at the Stoke Bar else you can very easily draw or slice the shot. If you’re not accurate with your timings, you will inadvertently put your next shot in a place that puts you at a big disadvantage. It is very unforgiving.

They have kept the power gauge and method of changing clubs which is simpler than other golf games.

When putting, I like the fact that you can change the maximum strength of the putter as this allows you to more accurately gauge the strength of your putt. That is not to say that putting is easy, of course. I found the putting to be very unforgiving with little margin for error. I still think the putting is the best and most accurate method to date. With regard to the 3D view of the green, it becomes a tad annoying when you need to keep rotate the view in order to check the line of your shot. One would think this would be done automatically.

Graphics

The first thing to notice is that they have moved away from illustrated pictures of courses and headshots of pros and have moved to digitized photos…and I have to say it looks great! The sprites have been rotoscoped too, allowing the addition of extra frames to ensure a more realistic golf swings. The courses themselves are also more detailed. The trees look a lot more realistic and the horizon contains detailed clouds in the skies and even some mountainous terrain.

However, I didn’t like that the fairways have been pixelated in two shades of green. I found it an attack on the eyes. I also didn’t like the new wind indicator, but overall, the HUD looks a bit slicker.

When comparing the game to its contemporaries, I think it looks much better than PGA European Tour (1994) (which is basically the same as PGA Tour Golf II (1992). I also prefer this instalment’s sprites over those of Pebble Beach Golf Links (1994). When it comes to the colouring of the courses, I also prefer the more muted, realistic palette of colours of PGA Tour Golf III than that of Pebble Beach Golf Links (1994). The edges of the sand bunkers and fairways are better too as on Pebble Beach Golf Links (1994), they look too angular rather than smooth curves.

Music & SFX

The only music that I recall is a slow piano like melody that is played over the leaderboard. I’m surprised there wasn’t any music played over the title screen.

Again, the minimalist sound creates a laid back and relaxing environment. The occasional thwack of the ball, the gentle ripple of applause from the crowd, and the infrequent bird tweets, does well to capture the atmosphere of the game.

Replay Value

The desire to do better draws you back in to play again and again. Having more courses also encourages further forays into the world of golf. Definitely a game enjoyed more in two-player mode.

Viewing the putting green has not changed at all. I guess if it ain’t broke…(screenshot taken by the author)

Did I Complete The Game?

I didn’t spend as much time on this game as I did on PGA Tour Golf II (1992) because I felt I grasped quickly what the game had to offer. I did not come anywhere near winning a tournament yet.

What The Critics Said:

Next Generation: “Other Genesis golf games have looked better (like the first Genesis golf game, Arnold Palmer Golf), but none maintain the depth of play or the true PGA experience like PGA III has been improved with an arc meter that helps control backspin. Golf fans put down that Golf Digest, keep your eye on the ball, keep your left arm straight, and pick up this game. Overall 4/5“.[1]

Liverpool Post: “Evolution not revolution, but PGA addicts will want it anyway. Overall 16/20.”[2]

My Verdict:

“Arguably, the most realistic golf game to date with regard to graphics and gameplay. Addictive and tough to beat, though, casual gamers may be deterred by its difficulty.”

Rating:

What are your memories of PGA Tour Golf III? I would love to hear your thoughts, and don’t for get to follow and subscribe so that you don’t miss my latest reviews! You can also find me on Instagram: @nicklovestogame.

[1] ‘Sega Genesis – Hole In One’. Next Generation. (March 1995). Issue 3:102.

[2] (Jan 7, 1995) ‘Fairway to go for revolution’. Liverpool Daily Post. p29.

by lawrenceofcanadia

Blockout – Review

Tetris (1988) is one of the most popular puzzle games of all time. The learning curve is steep, and the game is highly addictive. Although Sega owned arcade cabinets of Tetris (1988), licensing issues meant their Mega Drive release in 1989 had to be abandoned. This may account for the development of Blockout as a potential rival. The question soon became: would it be just as successful?

Title screen (screenshot taken by author)

Blockout is a 3D puzzle game developed by P.Z. Karen Co. Development Group and published by American Technos for the arcade in 1989. That same year, it was also released for Amiga, Apple IIGS, Commodore 64, Mac OS, MS-DOS, PC-98 (California Dreams). It was later released for Atari ST (California Dreams) and NES (Technos Japan Corp.) in 1990, Atari Lynx (Atari Corporation) and Sega Mega Drive (Electronic Arts) in 1991, and Virtual Boy (as 3D Tetris) in 1996. For this review, I played the Sega Mega Drive version.

Plot

There is no plot other than to earn the maximum points you can.

Gameplay

Played in single or two-player mode, you play by looking down a 3D “well” where blocks of varying shapes and sizes slowly descend. The slow descent rate gives you time to rotate the block around three coordinate axes and place it into your desired position. When a facet of the block touches the floor (or the lowest point of the well where a previous block has been placed), it will fill with colour, meaning you can no longer move or rotate that block. Every block you place earns you points. Once you have filled an entire layer (known as a “face”) and there are no gaps in that layer, it will disappear, earning you a bonus, and the rest of the cubes drop down as far as they can go. If you are able to empty the well, you will receive a “Block Out Bonus”. 

Like Tetris, as the game progresses and the levels increase, the speed with which the blocks fall gradually increases. The game continues until you fail, and the blocks fill the well.

It’s tetris but in 3D! (screenshot taken by author)

How Does It Handle?

The 3D element and three coordinate axes rotation format adds an extra degree of difficulty that you wouldn’t find in Tetris. It definitely takes a lot of practice. Being able to change the dimensions of the well is a nice feature too adding an extra challenge to the game.

Graphics

The graphics are basic, but they don’t need to be complicated for this game. Having different colours to differentiate each layer is sufficient for the game.

Music and SFX

The intro music is quite aggressive for a puzzle game. It remined me of the fuzzy musical notes of Road Rash (1991). There is no in-game music and minimal SFX when you place a block or complete a Face. I think some light music would not have gone amiss here.

Replay Value

For fans of Tetris and the like, I imagine this would be an addictive game, especially with a two-player mode.

Did I Complete The Game?

I’m not sure that you can complete this game but I didn’t spend too much time trying to find out. I don’t enjoy these sorts of games so don’t put in the time to become a good player. My highest score so far is a pitiful 18242.

Different colours help differentiate the layer (screenshot taken by author)

What The Critics Said:

MegaTech: “This sort of 3D Tetris is surely the finest Megadrive puzzle game available, packed with tons of options (including a simultaneous two-player mode) and featuring highly addictive gameplay, this is a must for your collection. Overall 91%”.[1]

Mean Machines: “This sort of 3D Tetris is surely the finest Megadrive puzzle game available. Packed with tons of options (including simultaneous two-player mode) and featuring highly addictive gameplay, this is a must for your collection. Overall 91%”.[2]

My Verdict:

“It’s Tetris in 3D. Personally, I’m not a huge fan of these sorts of games and but can appreciate their appeal and the skill and practice that goes into being able to achieve high scores. Ardent fans will play for hours and return time and time again.”

Rating:

What are your memories of Blockout? I would love to hear your thoughts, and don’t forget to follow and subscribe so that you don’t miss my latest reviews! You can also find me on Instagram: @nicklovestogame.

[1] ‘Game Index – Block Out’. MegaTech. (May 1992). Issue 6:76.

[2]’Review: Mega Drive – Block Out’. Mean Machines. (October 1992). Issue 1:137.

by lawrenceofcanadia

Alien Soldier – Review

Ah, emulation vs original hardware. There are very good arguments for both sides of this divisive coins. Personally, I do not have the funds, or patience, to seek out games I wish to play on original hardware due to the prices have been inflated by collectors, the scarcity of the original hardware and pure laziness. So, I say, thank God for emulation. Without emulation there are many, many games that I would never have heard of and would never have had the opportunity to play. Alien Soldier is one such game.

Title screen (Screenshot taken by the author)

Alien Soldier is a single-player side-scrolling run and gun video game developed by Treasure Co., LTD. and published by Sega. It was released for the Mega Drive in 1995 and would be re-released on PlayStation 2’s as part of the Gunstar Heroes Treasure Box (2006), Volume 25 of the Sega Ages 2500 series. It would go on to be re-released on the Wii Virtual Console (2007), Steam (2011), Nintendo Switch Online (2022) and the Sega Genesis Mini 2 (2022). For this review, I played the version found on Sega Mega Drive Classics (2010) for the PlayStation 4.

Plot

The plot to this game is a weird one. Basically, it’s 2015 and the planet Sierra is under attack by a terrorist group known as Scarlet. Led by the evil Xi-Tiger, they plan to destroy the human race. Scarlet’s former leader, Epilson-Eagle has sworn to defeat the terrorist group putting and end to Xi-Tiger’s evil scheming once and for all. (Bearing in mind, Epsilon-Eagle is not trying to save humanity but simply seeking revenge on Xi-Tiger).

Gameplay

Epsilon-Eagle must battle his way through 25 stages, defeating 26 bosses along the way. Before embarking on your mission, you must arm yourself with four out of a potential six weapons, each with their own advantages and disadvantages:

Select your weapons! (Screenshot taken by the author)

Buster Force – Firing bright yellow blasts at your enemy, this weapon has a weak attack but uses less ammo and has a good range.

Flame Force – A deadly flame that uses less ammo but is limited in range.

Sword Force – A deadly laser beam with a good range but that guzzles your ammo.

Ranger Force – Three way shot that is a bit of an all-rounder. Not as strong as the Sword or Lancer Forces but uses less ammo than them.

Homing Force – Flame thrower that seeks out the enemies’ weak spots. Great for bosses but not as strong as the Sword or Lancer Forces. It does use less ammo though.

Lancer Force – Another deadly laser beam with a good range but that guzzles your ammo.

To change weapons in game, please ‘A’ and cycle through the wheel until you find your desired weapon. press ‘A’ again to close the wheel.

Awesome graphics (Screenshot taken by the author)

How Does It Handle?

The controls are nice and responsive but take a little getting used to. You need to be super quick when changing weapons as the game will continue to play. Since there are only four weapons, I think it would have been better to simply press ‘A’ to cycle to the next weapon on the list. This would enable you to continue to evade your enemies rather than be a sitting duck.

Although you can block by double tapping the fire button but I don’t think this works very well. The six-button controller was around by this time so why not utilise it?

I like the idea tht there is a target on the bosses body so that you know where to shoot. Hardened gamers may disagree but this is a personal preference.

I don’t think I used the hover function until stage 11, but I certainly used the Zero Teleport. In fact, spoiler alert, using the Zero Teleport was the easiest way to defeat most bosses which made them a little monotonous after a while. Having said that, I’m yet to get past the boss on Stage 11 and you can’t use the Zero Teleport much on it.

Graphics

I think the game looks great. Epsilon-Eagle is well illustrated and animated and there is plenty of variation between the enemies and each boss is noticeably different. Lots of big explosions, screen shakes when the bosses have been defeated. I think the levels look great too with a nice variation of backgrounds which are very detailed and modestly coloured so as not to draw the eye away too much from the action.

Music and SFX

The music is very high-octane stuff which fits a game like this well. The issue is that I was so engrossed in what I was doing, I never noticed the music. I had to play through again and really pay attention to it. SFX-wise, again lots of explosions and laser noises but they get lost amid the chaos of the game. Although I do like the siren going off and the vocalised “Emergency” when you are coming to a boss battle.

Replay Value:

Having more than one difficulty setting always adds a little to the replay value but I think the game is very samey and did not make me want to continue playing.

The game focusses on boss battles more than level length (Screenshot taken by the author)

Did I Complete The Game?

No. At present, I got to stage 10 or 11 before I felt I had seen all the game has to offer. I will continue to play at a later date though.

What The Critics Said:

Consoles +: “A good shoot ’em up for the MD. Overall 88%“.[1]

Computer and Video Games: “This is a well worn genre and there aren’t many roads forward. Alien Soldier doesn’t exactly build a new orbital motorway, but it does lead you down quite an interesting road. Basing play on boss fighting isn’t a new idea, but Alien Soldier does quite a tidy job of delivering the goods. Alien Soldier will take any budding sadist a lot of determination to complete, my only worry is that your blood lust may dry and your interest shrivel into repetitive stress syndrome before you kill the final infernal boss. Overall 80%“.[2]

Mean Machines Sega: “A modern classic that turns the concept of platform blasting inside-out, but that suffers from being a bit samey. Overall 85%“.[3]

Verdict:

“Alien Soldier looks great and is exciting to play…at first. As the levels progress, the game becomes a bit monotonous.”

Rating:

What are your memories of Alien Soldier? I would love to hear your thoughts, and don’t for get to follow and subscribe so that you don’t miss my latest reviews! You can also find me on Instagram: @nicklovestogame.

[1] ‘Mega Driver Review – Alien Soldier’. Consoles +. (April 1995). No. 42. :131.

[2] ‘CVG Review/Showcase – Alien Soldier’. Computer and Video Games. (June 1995). Issue 163:52-57. 

[3] ‘Megadrive Review – Alien Soldier’ – Mean Machine Sega. (July 1995). Issue 33:80-81.